Week 27 (Apr. 17, 2019): ME 195B - Presentation #2 (Prototyping Stage Continuation) Reflection

-
Today, we completed Presentation 2, which is our 5th presentation overall, throughout the entire length of senior project, since last semester.

Please refer to our Presentation #2 slides, embedded below.

Covering the continuation of our prototyping efforts, we discussed progress on hardware acquisition, integration of components into a working circuit, and programming.

Regarding programming, we were still working on the communication between the Raspberry Pi and the Arduino. And while the circuit is also coming together, there was one piece that gave us problems yesterday: the gimbal motor broke and so we had to order another motor that is not a gimbal but is still a brushless DC motor. An image of the new motor is found in our presentation slides below. While this was disheartening at first, we found that the gimbal is not intended for continuous rotation, but instead for precise movement, as they are used for cameras on drones.

However, this was still a setback because the ESC was even more unsuited for the new brushless DC motor, more so than the gimbal motor. It was harder to control, and it was extremely fast, much faster than the gimbal motor. Nevertheless, we proposed a backup motor during our presentation: a mini-stepper motor that runs at 5V along with its dedicated driver board, the ULN2003.


In the meantime, however, we will go with the new brushless DC motor. The minimum voltage that the new brushless DC motor requires to operate is 7.4V; however, this was easily solved by using the boost converter. The new motor calculations are below:


1BETAFPV 4pcs 0703 Motor 19000KV Brushless Motors FPV RC for 1S Brushless Tiny Whoop Drone Multirotor Beta75 pro 2 etc
2Reading The Motor Constants From Typical Performance Characteristics

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 6 (Oct. 3, 2018): Coordination with the Small-Scale Bogie and Track Team

-
Image
Today, we discussed overlapping aspects of the small-scale system with the bogie team and the tracks team. The track team has settled on a design for the new track: a rectangular shape track with a Y-junction junction in the center to accommodate two charging stations, one at each branch. We are hoping to implement induction charging at these stations, which requires a 3.7 V Li-ion battery. Something else to consider is if we can use a transistor to amplify the current draw from the induction charger to speed up charging of the Li-ion battery and if we can use a boost converter (step-up transformer) for the brushless motor we will use. With the bogie team, we discussed motor sizing, as this selecting the appropriate motor would affect the force that the wheels would experience, and thus the design of the bogie. The force of the motor would be found by: (1) determining the power supply current output to the motor, I ; (2) converting the speed constant, K V , which is provided
Read more

Week 10 (Oct. 31, 2018): Battery Selection

-
Image
 UPDATE: Calculations for the induction charging and battery are found in the Week 14 and Week 15 blog posts. After finishing the last of the Presentation #2’s, time was provided to continue working on our projects. The first subject we wanted to address was to finalize the selection of our battery. So, we listed the pros and cons of the three main battery types: LiPo (Lithium-Polymer), NiMH (Nickel-Metal-Hydride), and Li-ion (Lithium-ion).   Sources: Roger’s Hobby Center | A Guide to Understanding LiPo Batteries and NiMH Vs LiPo Batteries - Which is better? and All About Batteries We eventually decided that we will be using LiPo batteries, like last year’s team, since they are more efficient and have a high energy density, along with their other benefits that outweigh their disadvantages and dominate the other battery types. Also, the fact that mini-LiPo chargers exist, such as the one below from Adafruit, will make charging more robust due to its compact design.
Read more

Week 4 (Sept. 19, 2018): Revised Project Objectives & Proposals

-
Today, Colin, a member of last year’s Small-Scale Controls Team and possibly our mentor/contact/guide, visited the Spartan Superway Design Center to provide us with advice, problems his team faced, features that they were hoping to implement but never got around to, and feedback on the design ideas we proposed.   Addressing our first idea of installing a differential drive system that would drive the wheels that move along the outer rail faster than the inner wheels when making a turn, preventing over-exertion of the servo motor steering the wheels when making a turn , Colin stated that we have two options: (1) Use two servo motors and incorporate the drive differential. However, Colin warned that he and his team used up all of their extra servo motors (about six extra) during their exhibition at Make’s Faire. So, he suggested buying three servos for each day spent at the Faire (three servos x three days = nine servos). If we want to pursue this idea, he suggested looking int
Read more